WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:14.240
The scientists are looking for exoplanets, but despite all their efforts, they couldn't

00:14.240 --> 00:15.360
find any so far.

00:15.360 --> 00:19.920
Isn't it very extraordinary that the universe is so big, but our planet seems to be the

00:19.920 --> 00:25.640
only one with conditions right for life and that it looks very specially created and very

00:25.640 --> 00:28.080
well protected?

00:28.080 --> 00:36.000
Prior to 1995, there had been many attempts for detection of planets around other stars,

00:36.000 --> 00:40.040
and these would be extrasolar planets or exoplanets.

00:40.040 --> 00:47.100
And every attempt or every discovery was proven to be either subject to doubt or just incorrect.

00:47.100 --> 00:55.860
But in 1995, two teams discovered planets, a planet around 51 Pegasi.

00:55.860 --> 00:59.720
This was a real observation of a planet around another star.

00:59.720 --> 01:04.780
At that point, there was a very great sense of euphoria in the scientific community because

01:04.780 --> 01:09.660
for the first time, we had begun to have techniques that are sensitive to seeing planets around

01:09.660 --> 01:10.780
other stars.

01:10.780 --> 01:16.860
So in 1995, the expectation was that there are planets abundantly around other stars and

01:16.860 --> 01:20.700
many planets like the Earth will be very easily observable.

01:20.700 --> 01:28.620
If you look at statements made, for example, to national academies or to the Congress of the

01:28.620 --> 01:34.620
United States by American scientists, they talk about billions of Earths just within our galaxy.

01:34.620 --> 01:41.540
But in fact, since 1995, as our techniques have even more improved, yes, what we have seen is thousands

01:41.540 --> 01:42.540
of planets.

01:42.540 --> 01:44.540
We have seen thousands of planets around other stars.

01:44.540 --> 01:50.540
But then when you ask to compare those planets with the Earth, what you find is that planets,

01:50.540 --> 01:56.540
yes, there are, but Earth-like planets, there essentially are not because the requirements for

01:56.540 --> 02:00.740
an Earth-like planet are many, many requirements.

02:00.740 --> 02:05.860
The planet itself has to be situated in what is called the habitable zone.

02:05.860 --> 02:12.740
A habitable zone is essentially a distance from the sun where the temperature of the, the

02:12.740 --> 02:17.860
mean temperature of the planet is one in which liquid water can exist at least somewhere on

02:17.860 --> 02:19.180
the planet.

02:19.180 --> 02:25.780
So if you're too close, what you end up having is that there is excess heat and the heat evaporates

02:25.780 --> 02:28.820
the water which causes a greenhouse effect.

02:28.820 --> 02:35.500
This causes an effect that planetary geologists call the moist greenhouse that then leads to

02:35.500 --> 02:40.460
a runaway greenhouse and so that all the water essentially evaporates.

02:40.460 --> 02:45.820
When it evaporates, it gets to the upper reaches of the atmosphere where a particle process called

02:45.820 --> 02:51.560
sputtering essentially sends particles from the sun and knock off the hydrogen off the upper

02:51.560 --> 02:55.040
atmosphere of the planet and the planet becomes desiccated.

02:55.040 --> 02:58.980
So it doesn't just stay moist, it just actually gets desiccated.

02:58.980 --> 03:05.960
On the other hand, if the planet is too far from the sun, the star, then the moisture will

03:05.960 --> 03:12.260
snow down on the, onto the surface of the planet where the albedo, which is the reflectivity

03:12.260 --> 03:14.080
of the planet, goes up.

03:14.080 --> 03:19.160
As it does that, the planet temperature drops which causes more snowing and you end up with

03:19.160 --> 03:21.640
a situation called the snowball Earth.

03:21.640 --> 03:26.160
So you have a runaway greenhouse on one end and a snowball on the other end and only in

03:26.160 --> 03:28.240
the middle is a perfect state.

03:28.240 --> 03:33.900
Now calculations have been done to say from the Earth, how far closer can I go before I

03:33.900 --> 03:35.660
get into a runaway greenhouse?

03:35.660 --> 03:38.580
Some of these calculations put it at 1%.

03:38.580 --> 03:42.180
We're 1% closer and we get into a runaway greenhouse.

03:42.180 --> 03:44.800
So we are very, very perfectly situated.

03:44.800 --> 03:47.880
And that's just from the standpoint of distance.

03:47.880 --> 03:50.740
Then the point is that not all stars are the same.

03:50.740 --> 03:57.380
We have a very stable, energetic star, a massive, energetic, stable star.

03:57.380 --> 04:02.520
If our star was one of the more common stars, like an M star, which would be a cooler star,

04:02.520 --> 04:04.820
the habitable zone is closer.

04:04.820 --> 04:08.440
I have to be closer to be habitable, to have the moisture.

04:08.440 --> 04:12.480
But when I'm that close, it turns out I'm very close to a star which is very unstable.

04:12.480 --> 04:19.240
M stars have a lot of strong energy output changes that also damage the planet.

04:19.240 --> 04:25.160
The other thing that happens is that the planet's day and night cycle, which is governed by its

04:25.160 --> 04:31.300
spin, as you get closer there's a gravitational effect called tidal friction and tidal locking,

04:31.300 --> 04:36.380
which essentially locks the planet so that one side of the planet is the only site that's

04:36.380 --> 04:37.380
seen.

04:37.380 --> 04:42.160
So one side of the planet totally burns up, the other side just, you know, gets just super

04:42.160 --> 04:43.160
chilled.

04:43.160 --> 04:48.160
These are just two of a great number of conditions that have come together for the Earth.

